Skip to main content

Table 21 Kidney cancer; individual effect (relative risk/odds ratio) estimates

From: Systematic review of the relation between smokeless tobacco and cancer in Europe and North America

 

ST use

  

RR/OR

Sourcea

Typeb

Exposurec

Smoking

Sex

Id.

Casesd

Estimate (95%CI)

Adjustment factorse

Cohort studies

        

Norway cohorts: Boffetta et al. 2005 [26]

Snuff

Current

Any

M

1

9

0.47 (0.23–0.94)

age, smok

  

Former

  

2

13

1.17 (0.63–2.16)

 
  

Ever

  

3

22

0.72 (0.44–1.18)

 

Case-control studies

        

Bennington and Laubscher 1968 [47]

Chew

Use

Any

M

4

5

1.22 (0.39–3.85)f

none

   

Never

 

5

5

4.80 (1.18–19.59)f

age

Armstrong et al. 1976 [53]

ST

Current

Any

M

6

6

0.98 (0.30–3.15)f

none

  

Former

  

7

6

0.73 (0.24–2.20)f

 
  

Ever

  

8

12

0.84 (0.37–1.92)f

 

Williams and Horm 1977 [55]

ST

Ever

Any

M

9

3

0.59 (0.18–1.90)f

none

    

F

10

1

1.26 (0.17–9.33)f

 

McLaughlin et al. 1984 [65]

Chew

Use

Any

M

11

NA

0.40 (0.10–2.60)

age, smok

 

Snuff

   

12

NA

1.70 (0.50–6.00)

 
 

ST

   

13

NA

1.00 (0.37–2.68)g

 

Goodman et al. 1986 [68]

Chew

Ever

Any

M

14h

13

4.00 (1.13 – 14.17)

age, hosp, race, tadm

Asal et al. 1988 [73]

Snuff

Use

Any

M

15i

NA

3.60 (1.20–13.30)

age, hosp, race, tadm

     

16j

NA

no association

age, race, tadm

McLaughlin et al. 1995 [99]

ST

Use

Never

M+F

17

11

1.30 (0.60–3.10)

age, bmi, res, sex

Muscat et al. 1995 [100]

Chew

Ever

Any

M

18

14

3.20 (1.10–8.70)

age, edu

Yuan et al. 1998 [106]

ST

Ever

Any

M+F

19

32

1.02 (0.56–1.85)

age, edu, smok

  1. a Fuller details of the studies are given in Tables 1 and 2.
  2. b ST implies smokeless tobacco unspecified, or combined snuff use or chewing.
  3. c Ever, former and current ST use were compared with never ST. Use indicates timing not given and comparison is with non use.
  4. d 'Id.' is the RR/OR identification number used in Table 22, and 'Cases' is the number of cases in ST users as defined. NA = not available.
  5. e Abbreviations used: bmi = body mass index, edu = education, hosp = hospital, res = residence, smok = smoking, tadm = time of admission.
  6. f RR/OR and/or 95% CI estimated from data provided in the source.
  7. g Estimated assuming ORs for chewing and snuff are independent.
  8. h The authors also report the results of an analysis adjusting for the effects of the matching factors, body mass index, decaffeinated coffee use and continuous pack-years of cigarette smoking. The authors estimated an OR (95% CI) of 0.87 (0.15–5.14) for the effect of chewing among never smokers of cigarettes, and of 26.00 (4.41–153.00) for the joint effect of pack-years cigarette smoking and chewing tobacco use. These results could not readily be incorporated into the meta-analyses as no overall estimate for chewing tobacco use adjusted for cigarette smoking was available.
  9. i Analysis uses hospital controls.
  10. j Analysis uses population controls.
  11. CI = confidence interval; ST = smokeless tobacco; OR = odds ratio; RR = relative risk.