Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Routine resite of peripheral intravenous devices every 3 days did not reduce complications compared with clinically indicated resite: a randomised controlled trial

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
13 Apr 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
4 May 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Antoni Trilla
9 May 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Louise Rose
10 May 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Charlie Goldsmith
8 Jun 2010 Author responded Author comments - Matthew McGrail
Resubmission - Version 2
8 Jun 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 2
14 Jun 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Antoni Trilla
24 Jun 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Louise Rose
3 Jul 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Charlie Goldsmith
22 Jul 2010 Author responded Author comments - Matthew McGrail
Resubmission - Version 3
22 Jul 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
10 Sep 2010 Editorially accepted
10 Sep 2010 Article published 10.1186/1741-7015-8-53

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement