Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Significance testing as perverse probabilistic reasoning

  • M Brandon Westover1Email author,
  • Kenneth D Westover2 and
  • Matt T Bianchi1
BMC Medicine20119:20

https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-9-20

Received: 14 July 2010

Accepted: 28 February 2011

Published: 28 February 2011

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
14 Jul 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
3 Aug 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - John Kruschke
17 Aug 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Zoltan Dienes
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
22 Sep 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Zoltan Dienes
14 Oct 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - John Kruschke
7 Nov 2010 Author responded Author comments - M. Brandon Westover
Resubmission - Version 3
7 Nov 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 3
30 Nov 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - John Kruschke
23 Dec 2010 Author responded Author comments - M. Brandon Westover
Resubmission - Version 4
23 Dec 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
28 Feb 2011 Editorially accepted
28 Feb 2011 Article published 10.1186/1741-7015-9-20

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
(2)
Harvard Radiation Oncology Program, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA

Advertisement