Perceptions of general practitioners towards the use of a new system for treating back pain: a qualitative interview study
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|21 Dec 2010||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|27 Jan 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jacqueline Tetroe|
|30 Jan 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Kate O'Donnell|
|17 Feb 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Tom Sanders|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|17 Feb 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|21 Mar 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Kate O'Donnell|
|30 Mar 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Tom Sanders|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|30 Mar 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|9 May 2011||Editorially accepted|
|9 May 2011||Article published||10.1186/1741-7015-9-49|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.