Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Results from evaluations of models and cost-effectiveness tools to support introduction decisions for new vaccines need critical appraisal

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
19 Nov 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
27 Dec 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David Bishai
17 Jan 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Hanna Maria Nohynek
4 Feb 2011 Author responded Author comments - Raymond Hutubessy
Resubmission - Version 2
4 Feb 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 2
7 Feb 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David Bishai
13 Apr 2011 Author responded Author comments - Raymond Hutubessy
Resubmission - Version 3
13 Apr 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
12 May 2011 Editorially accepted
12 May 2011 Article published 10.1186/1741-7015-9-55

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement