Results from evaluations of models and cost-effectiveness tools to support introduction decisions for new vaccines need critical appraisal
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|19 Nov 2010||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|27 Dec 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - David Bishai|
|17 Jan 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Hanna Maria Nohynek|
|4 Feb 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Raymond Hutubessy|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|4 Feb 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|7 Feb 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - David Bishai|
|13 Apr 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Raymond Hutubessy|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|13 Apr 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|12 May 2011||Editorially accepted|
|12 May 2011||Article published||10.1186/1741-7015-9-55|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.