Skip to main content

Table 1 Study characteristics and mortality rates according to smoking status at index event

From: The "smoker's paradox" in patients with acute coronary syndrome: a systematic review

Study

Paradox?

Time

symptoms to inclusion

Publ.

Enroll.

Index

Event

n

Current (C)

n (age)

Former (F)

n (age)

Never (N)

n (age)

Follow

-up

Total mortality

Adjusted mortality rates

with 95% confidence interval

           

C

F

N

 

Randomised clinical trials in STEMI patients (thrombolytic treatment)

GUSTO-1 [13]

Yes

3.2 ± 1.65 h

1995

90 to 93

STEMI

40,599

17,507 (55)

11,117 (64)

11,975 (66)

30d

4.0%

6.7%

10.3%

OR 1.25 (1.11 to 1.39) N vs. C

Barbash et al. [12]

Yes

3.0 ± 1.6 h

1993

88 to 89

STEMI

8,259

3,649 (58)

2,244 (64)

2,366 (67)

6 m

7.7%

12.1%

17.6%

OR 1.35 (1.12 to 1.61) N vs. C+F

GISSI-2 [23]

No

< 3 h in 70%

1998

88 to 89

STEMI

9,694

5,151 (57)

1,932 (64)

2,611 (68)

In-hosp.

4.7%

7.6%

13.8%

OR 0.80 (0.60 to 1.07) C vs. N

OR 0.97 (0.70 to 1.35) F vs. N

Randomised clinical trials in STEMI patients (invasive treatment)

CADILLAC [27]

No

< 12 h

2004

97 to 99

STEMI

2,082

898 (53)

546 (64)

638 (65)

1 y

2.9%

3.7%

6.6%

HR 0.96 (0.52 to 1.76) C vs. N

Randomised clinical trials in patients with NSTE-ACS (invasive treatment)

SYNERGY [22, 24]

No

< 24 h

2008

01 to 02

NSTE

-ACS

9,971

2,404 (61)

3,491 (69)

4,076 (70)

1 y

6.5%

9.1%

6.7%

HR 1.77 (1.42 to 2.21) C vs. N

Multi-centre post-AMI randomised trials

TRACE [21]

No

2 to 6 d

1999

90 to 92

AMI

6,485

3,341 (64)

1,420 (71)

1,724 (74)

3 y

26 to

27%

38 to

39%

42 to

43%

HR 1.04 (0.93 to 1.15) C vs. N

OPTIMAAL [20]

No

< 10 d

2004

98 to 99

AMI

5,475

1,832 (62)

1,867 (69)

1,776 (71)

2.7 y

16.3%

Incl. in

C

19.3%

HR 1.08 (0.93 to 1.25) C+F vs. N

Single-centre observational studies of patients with AMI

Mølstad [25]

Yes

NA

1991

82 to 84

AMI

484

184 (61)

Incl. in N

456 (70)

3 m

11 to

13%

Incl. in

N

32 to

34%

HR 0.62 (0.36 to 1.04) C vs. N+F

HR 0.55 (0.33 to 0.93) C vs. N+F

Bettencourt et al. [14]

No

NA

2004

01 to 02

ACS

901

369 (58)

Incl. in C

532 (69)

In-hosp.

2.6%

Incl. in F

6.6%

OR 0.96 (0.38 to 2.41) C+F vs. N

Gaspar et al. [16]

No

NA

2009

04 to 07

ACS

1,228

450 (58)

Incl. in C

778 (68)

6 m

9.3%

Incl. in C

13.1%

OR 1.25 (0.61 to 2.54) C+F vs. N

Aune et al . § [7]

No

NA

2010

03 to 07

NSTEMI

381

103 (63)

Incl. in N

278 (80)

1y

22%

Incl. in N

27%

HR 2.61 (1.43 to 4.79) C vs. N+F

Registries

              

Gottlieb et al. [17]

No

NA

1996

94

AMI

999

367 (57)

Incl. in N

632 (67)

6 m

7.9%

Incl. in N

21.5%

HR 0.84 (0.54 to 1.30) C vs. N+F

Andrikopoulos et al.

[11]

No

< 24 h

2001

93 to 94

AMI

5507

3,853 (59)

Excluded

1,654 (70)

In-hosp.

7.4%

NA

14.5%

RR 1.12 (0.86 to 1.44) C vs. N

NRMI 2 [18]

Yes

NA

2002

94 to 97

AMI

297,458

72,585 (58)

Incl. in N

224,871 (72)

In-hosp.

8.0%

Incl. in N

16.4%

OR 0.86 (0.83 to 0.90) C vs. N+F

ARIAM [26]

Yes

< 24 h

criterion

2004

95 to 01

AMI

17,761

5,796 (57)

3,494 (67)

8,471 (70)

ICU/CCU

5.0%

9.3%

13.3%

OR 0.77 (0.66 to 0.91) C vs. N

     

UAP

7,795

1,721

1,950

4,124

ICU/CCU

0.7%

1.0%

1.5%

OR 0.81 (0.48 to 1.36) C vs. N

IBERICA [15]

Yes

< 12 h in 82%

2007

97 to 98

AMI

7,796

3,057 (56)

1,730

2,839 (65)

28 d

8.9%

16.9%

20.1%

OR 0.57 (0.42 to 0.78) C vs. N

GRACE [19]

No

NA

2005

99 to 02

ACS

19,325

5,276 (57)

5,691 (67)

8,358 (71)

In-hosp.

3.3%

4.5%

6.9%

OR 1.01 (0.80 to 1.27) C vs. N

  1. ACS, acute coronary syndrome; AMI, acute myocardial infarction; CCU, coronary care unit; HR, hazard ratio; ICU, intensive care unit; OR, odds ratio; NA, not available; NST-ACS, non-ST-segment acute coronary syndrome; NSTEMI, non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction; RR, relative risk; STEMI, ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction; UAP, unstable angina pectoris. §The adjusted HR is for the conservative treatment cohort (2003) only. For the invasive cohort (2006) there was no difference in mortality for smokers and non-smokers (data not published).