Skip to main content

Table 5 Characteristics of the 11 identified studies

From: Could low grade bacterial infection contribute to low back pain? A systematic review

Studies

Study design

Demographics, n (% Female)

Clinical features and surgery performed

Study inclusions/exclusions (includes previous interventions)

Modic changes examined

Control group

Quality score

Mean age (years)

Disc studies

     

Albert [2]

Cross-sectional/ cohort

61 (27% F)

Disc herniation

Inclusions:

Yes – Type, size, and volume were graded according to the Nordic Modic Protocol

No

78/75

Age: 46.4

Primary surgery at a single spinal level

18 to 65 years old

MRI-confirmed lumbar disc herniation

 

Exclusions:

Received antibiotic treatment within previous 2 weeks

Stirling [14]

Cross-sectional

36 (NA)

Discogenic radiculitis

Not specified

No

No

78

Age: NA

Microdiscectomy

Stirling [17]

Cross-sectional

207 (NA)

Discogenic radiculitis

Not specified

No

Yes – patients with trauma, tumour, or scoliosis

56

Age: NA

Microdisectomy

Agarwal [16]

Cross-sectional

52 (42% F)

Radiculopathy

Inclusions:

No

No

78

Age: 43.9

Disc herniation

Sensory or motor symptoms in a single lumbar nerve distribution

Lumbar microdiscectomy

Positive physical examination findings (positive straight leg raise test, distributional weakness, diminished deep tendon reflexes)

MRI lumbar spine positive for HNP

Exclusions:

Diabetes mellitus, oral steroid use in the month before surgery, other immunosuppressive medications

Plain radiography demonstrating severe loss of disc height

High grade degenerative disc disease, spondylolisthesis > grade 1

History of prior lumbar surgery, multilevel symptomatic HNP or trauma

Red flags (progressive weakness, bowel/bladder complaints, radiographic unknown mass, unexpected weight loss)

Diagnosis of inflammatory arthritides, crystalline arthropathies, or other rheumatologic diseases

Arndt [9]

Cross-sectional

83 (59% F)

Disc degeneration

Not specified

Yes – Type 1 and 2 according to the Modic classification

No

67

Age: 41

Lumbar disc replacement at L3-4, L4-5, or L5-S1

Coscia [11]

Cross-sectional

165 (NA)

Disc herniation

Not specified

No

Yes – Five groups, including cervical disc herniations, lumbar disc herniations, lumbar discogenic pain, deformity, and control

78

Age: NA

Surgery not specified

Ben-Galim [10]

Cross-sectional

30 (40% F)

Disc herniation

Exclusions:

No

No

67

Age: 46.4 (NA)

Lumbar discectomy

Individuals who had been treated with antibiotics in the 2 months preceding the study

Those who had undergone back surgery

History of intradiscal injections

Fritzell [12]

Cross-sectional

10 (40% F)

Disc herniation

Not stated

No

No

67

Age (range): 20–47

Surgery not specified

Carricajo [13]

Cross-sectional

54 (41%)

Disc herniation

Not stated

No

No

67

Age: 44.8 (NA)

Surgery not specified

Albert [1]

Randomised controlled trial

Intervention group:

Chronic LBP (>6 months) occurring after a previous disc herniation and who also had Modic type 1 changes in the vertebrae adjacent to the previous herniation

Inclusions:

Yes – Modic Type 1 only; size and volume of Modic changes were graded according to the Nordic Modic Protocol

Yes

100

Aged between 18 and 65 years

90 (58.2% F)

MRI-confirmed disc herniation L3/L4 or L4/L5 or L5/S1 within the preceding 6–24 months

Age: 44.7 (10.3)

Placebo group:

Lower back pain of >6 months duration

72 (58.2% F)

Nil surgery

Modic type 1 changes adjacent to the previously herniated disc on repeat MRI

Age: 45.5 (9.2)

Exclusions:

Allergy to antibiotics

Current pregnancy or lactation

Any kidney disease

Pending litigation

Bone studies

Wedderkopp [15]

Cross-sectional

24 (58% F)

‘Persistent LBP’ Modic type I changes in at least 1 vertebra

Inclusion: Type 1 Modic changes on MRI

Yes – Modic Type 1 only

No

67

Age: 43 (NA)

No surgery performed

  1. HNP, Herniated nucleus pulposus; LBP, Low back pain.