TY - JOUR AU - Kassirer, J. P. AU - Campion, E. W. PY - 1994 DA - 1994// TI - Peer review: crude and understudied, but indispensable JO - JAMA. VL - 272 UR - https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1994.03520020022005 DO - 10.1001/jama.1994.03520020022005 ID - Kassirer1994 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Jefferson, T. AU - Rudin, M. AU - Folse, S. AU - Davidoff, F. PY - 2007 DA - 2007// TI - Editorial peer review for improving the quality of reports of biomedical studies JO - Cochrane Database Syst Rev. VL - 18 ID - Jefferson2007 ER - TY - CHAP AU - Rennie, R. ED - Godlee, F. ED - Jefferson, T. PY - 2003 DA - 2003// TI - Editorial peer review: its development and rationale BT - Peer review in health sciences PB - BMJ Books CY - London ID - Rennie2003 ER - TY - STD TI - Public Library of Science. Peer review—optimizing practices for online scholarly communication. In: House of Commons Science and Technology Committee, editor. Peer Review in Scientific Publications, Eighth Report of Session 2010–2012, Vol. I: Report, Together with Formal, Minutes, Oral and Written Evidence. London: The Stationery Office Limited; 2011. p. 21–2. ID - ref4 ER - TY - STD TI - Public Library of Science. Peer review—optimizing practices for online scholarly communication. In: House of Commons Science and Technology Committee, editor. Peer Review in Scientific Publications, Eighth Report of Session 2010–2012, Vol. I: Report, Together with Formal, Minutes, Oral and Written Evidence. London: The Stationery Office Limited; 2011. p. 174–8. ID - ref5 ER - TY - STD TI - Rubriq. How we found 15 million hours of lost time. In: Rubriq: independent peer review system. 2013. http://blog.rubriq.com/2013/06/03/how-we-found-15-million-hours-of-lost-time/. Accessed 27 Mar 2015. UR - http://blog.rubriq.com/2013/06/03/how-we-found-15-million-hours-of-lost-time/ ID - ref6 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Ghimire, S. AU - Kyung, E. AU - Kang, W. AU - Kin, E. PY - 2012 DA - 2012// TI - Assessment of adherence to the CONSORT statement for quality of reports on randomized controlled trial abstracts from four high-impact general medical journals JO - Trials VL - 13 UR - https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-13-77 DO - 10.1186/1745-6215-13-77 ID - Ghimire2012 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Boutron, I. AU - Dutton, S. AU - Ravaud, P. AU - Altman, D. G. PY - 2010 DA - 2010// TI - Reporting and interpretation of randomized controlled trials with statistically nonsignificant results for primary outcomes JO - JAMA. VL - 303 UR - https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2010.651 DO - 10.1001/jama.2010.651 ID - Boutron2010 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Hopewell, S. AU - Collins, G. S. AU - Boutron, I. AU - Yu, L. M. AU - Cook, J. AU - Shanyinde, M. PY - 2014 DA - 2014// TI - Impact of peer review on reports of randomised trials published in open peer review journals: retrospective before and after study JO - BMJ. VL - 349 UR - https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g4145 DO - 10.1136/bmj.g4145 ID - Hopewell2014 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Turner, E. H. AU - Matthew, A. M. AU - Linardatos, E. AU - Tell, R. A. AU - Rosenthal, R. PY - 2008 DA - 2008// TI - Selective publication of antidepressant trials and its confluence on apparent efficacy JO - N Engl J Med. VL - 358 UR - https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa065779 DO - 10.1056/NEJMsa065779 ID - Turner2008 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Melander, H. AU - Ahlqvist-Rastad, J. AU - Meijer, G. AU - Beermann, B. PY - 2003 DA - 2003// TI - Evidence b(i)ased medicine–selective reporting from studies sponsored by pharmaceutical industry: review of studies in new drug applications JO - BMJ. VL - 326 UR - https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.326.7400.1171 DO - 10.1136/bmj.326.7400.1171 ID - Melander2003 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Rowe, B. H. AU - Strome, T. L. AU - Spooner, C. AU - Bilitz, S. AU - Grafstein, E. AU - Worster, A. PY - 2006 DA - 2006// TI - Reviewer agreement trends from four years of electronic submissions of conference abstract JO - BMC Med Res Methodol VL - 6 UR - https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-6-14 DO - 10.1186/1471-2288-6-14 ID - Rowe2006 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Jackson, J. L. AU - Srinivasan, M. AU - Rea, J. AU - Fletcher, K. E. AU - Kravitz, R. L. PY - 2011 DA - 2011// TI - The validity of peer review in a general medicine journal JO - PLoS ONE. VL - 6 UR - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0022475 DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0022475 ID - Jackson2011 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Weiner, B. K. AU - Weiner, J. P. AU - Smith, H. E. PY - 2010 DA - 2010// TI - Spine journals: is reviewer agreement on publication recommendations greater than would be expected by chance? JO - Spine J. VL - 10 UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2009.12.003 DO - 10.1016/j.spinee.2009.12.003 ID - Weiner2010 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Bohannon, J. PY - 2013 DA - 2013// TI - Who’s afraid by peer review? JO - Science. VL - 342 UR - https://doi.org/10.1126/science.342.6154.60 DO - 10.1126/science.342.6154.60 ID - Bohannon2013 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Schroter, S. AU - Black, N. AU - Evans, S. AU - Godlee, F. AU - Osorio, L. AU - Smith, R. PY - 2008 DA - 2008// TI - What errors do peer reviewers detect, and does training improve their ability to detect them? JO - J R Soc Med. VL - 101 UR - https://doi.org/10.1258/jrsm.2008.080062 DO - 10.1258/jrsm.2008.080062 ID - Schroter2008 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Hirst, A. AU - Altman, D. G. PY - 2012 DA - 2012// TI - Are peer reviewers encouraged to use reporting guidelines? A survey of 116 health research journals JO - PlosOne VL - 7 UR - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0035621 DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0035621 ID - Hirst2012 ER - TY - STD TI - Van Exel J, de Graaf G. Q methodology: A sneak preview. http://qmethod.org/articles/vanExel.pdf. 2005. Accessed 28 Mar 2014. UR - http://qmethod.org/articles/vanExel.pdf ID - ref18 ER - TY - BOOK AU - Watts, S. AU - Stenner, P. PY - 2012 DA - 2012// TI - Doing Q methodological research: theory, method and interpretation PB - Sage Publications CY - London UR - https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446251911 DO - 10.4135/9781446251911 ID - Watts2012 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Brown, S. PY - 1996 DA - 1996// TI - Q-methodology and qualitative research JO - Qual Life Res. VL - 6 ID - Brown1996 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Dennis, K. E. PY - 1986 DA - 1986// TI - Q methodology: relevance and application to nursing research JO - Adv Nurs Sci. VL - 8 UR - https://doi.org/10.1097/00012272-198604000-00003 DO - 10.1097/00012272-198604000-00003 ID - Dennis1986 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Mathieu, S. AU - Chan, A. W. AU - Ravaud, P. PY - 2013 DA - 2013// TI - Use of trial register information during the peer review process JO - PLoS One. VL - 10 ID - Mathieu2013 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Stephenson, W. PY - 1935 DA - 1935// TI - Correlating persons instead of tests JO - J Personality. VL - 4 UR - https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1935.tb02022.x DO - 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1935.tb02022.x ID - Stephenson1935 ER - TY - STD TI - Hackert C, Braehler G. FlashQ. 2007. http://www.hackert.biz/flashq/. Accessed 30 Mar 2014. UR - http://www.hackert.biz/flashq/ ID - ref24 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Baxt, W. G. AU - Waeckerle, J. F. AU - Berlin, J. A. AU - Callaham, M. L. PY - 1998 DA - 1998// TI - Who reviews the reviewers? Feasibility of using a fictitious manuscript to evaluate peer reviewer performance JO - Ann Emerg Med. VL - 32 UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/S0196-0644(98)70006-X DO - 10.1016/S0196-0644(98)70006-X ID - Baxt1998 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Kravitz, R. L. AU - Franks, P. AU - Feldman, M. D. AU - Gerrity, M. AU - Byrne, C. AU - Tierney, W. M. PY - 2010 DA - 2010// TI - Editorial peer reviewers' recommendations at a general medical journal: are they reliable and do editors care? JO - PLoS One. VL - 5 UR - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010072 DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0010072 ID - Kravitz2010 ER - TY - STD TI - Henderson M. Problems with peer review. BMJ. 2010;340:c1409. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c1409. UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c1409 ID - ref27 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Yaffe, M. B. PY - 2009 DA - 2009// TI - Re-reviewing peer review JO - Sci Signal VL - 2 UR - https://doi.org/10.1126/scisignal.2000143 DO - 10.1126/scisignal.2000143 ID - Yaffe2009 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Stahel, P. F. AU - Moore, E. E. PY - 2014 DA - 2014// TI - Peer review for biomedical publications: we can improve the system JO - BMC Med. VL - 12 UR - https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-014-0179-1 DO - 10.1186/s12916-014-0179-1 ID - Stahel2014 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Matthieu, S. AU - Boutron, I. AU - Moher, D. AU - Altman, D. G. AU - Ravaud, P. PY - 2009 DA - 2009// TI - Comparison of registered and published primary outcomes in randomized controlled trials JO - JAMA VL - 302 UR - https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2009.1242 DO - 10.1001/jama.2009.1242 ID - Matthieu2009 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Cobo, E. AU - Cortés, J. AU - Ribera, J. M. AU - Cardellach, F. AU - Selva-O'Callaghan, A. AU - Kostov, B. PY - 2011 DA - 2011// TI - Effect of using reporting guidelines during peer review on quality of final manuscripts submitted to a biomedical journal: masked randomised trial JO - BMJ. VL - 22 ID - Cobo2011 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Mills, E. J. AU - Wu, P. AU - Gagnier, J. AU - Devereaux, P. J. PY - 2005 DA - 2005// TI - The quality of randomized trial reporting in leading medical journals since the revised CONSORT statement JO - Contemp Clin Trials. VL - 26 UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2005.02.008 DO - 10.1016/j.cct.2005.02.008 ID - Mills2005 ER -