Skip to main content

Table 2 Participant characteristics

From: The most important tasks for peer reviewers evaluating a randomized controlled trial are not congruent with the tasks most often requested by journal editors

Characteristic

Total

 

N = 203

Expertise

N (%)

− Clinician

93 (45.8)

− Methodologist

72 (35.5)

− Both (clinician/methodologist)

17 (8.4)

− Other

21 (10.3)

Affiliationa

 

− Non-profit

179 (95.7)

− For-profit

5 (2.7)

− Publisher

3 (1.6)

Countryb

 

− Oceania

14 (8.9)

− South America/Asia

15 (9.6)

− USA/Canada

51 (32.5)

− Europe

77 (49.0)

Total no. of completed randomized trials participated in as an investigatorc

 

−0

17 (8.4)

−1–5

99 (48.8)

−6–10

42 (20.7)

−11–15

19 (9.4)

−16–20

4 (2.0)

− >20

22 (10.8)

Mean no. of articles peer-reviewed per yearc

 

−1–5

35 (17.2)

−6–10

51 (25.1)

−11–20

55 (27.1)

−20–50

39 (19.2)

− >50

23 (11.3)

Mean no. of articles reporting an RCT peer-reviewed per yearc

 

−1–5

150 (73.9)

−6–10

27 (13.3)

−11–20

13 (6.4)

−20–50

8 (3.9)

− >50

5 (2.5)

Ask colleagues to help with the peer reviewc

 

− Never

58 (28.6)

− Rarely

92 (45.3)

− Sometimes

41 (20.2)

− Regularly

10 (4.9)

− Always

2 (1.0)

Trainingd

 

− Formal academic training

33 (16.4)

− Mentoring by your supervisor

59 (29.4)

− Tutorial on training sessions offered by editors

13 (6.5)

− Not trained

61 (30.3)

− Other trained

2 (1.0)

− Several forms of training

33 (16.4)

Mean time for a peer review of an RCT (hours)c

 

− <1

7 (3.4)

−1–2

72 (35.5)

−2–4

85 (41.9)

− >4

39 (19.2)

Agree to disclose your name when proposed or requested by an editorc

 

− Never

25 (12.3)

− Rarely

25 (12.3)

− Sometimes

49 (24.1)

− Regularly

45 (22.2)

− Always

59 (29.1)

  1. a12 (5.9 %) missing data; b46 (22.7 %) missing data; cNo missing data; d2 (1 %) missing data
  2. RCT Randomized controlled trial