Skip to main content

Table 2 Methodological quality assessment using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale [12]

From: Sex differences in medico-legal action against doctors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Cohort studies

 

Selection

Comparability

Outcome

 

Representativeness of exposed cohort

Selection of non exposed cohort

Ascertainment of exposure

Demonstration outcome not present at start of study

Comparability of cohorts

Ascertainment of outcome

Follow-up long enough for outcomes to occur

Adequacy of follow up of cohorts

Alam et al. [14] (2011)

★

★

★

★

 

★

★

★

Alam et al. [13] (2013)

★

★

★

★

 

★

★

★

Baldwin et al. [24] (1991)

★

★

★

★

★★

★

★

★

Birkeland et al. [15] (2013)

★

★

★

★

★★

★

★

★

Bismark et al. [38] (2013)

★

★

★

★

★★

★

★

★

Donaldson et al. [39] (2014)

★

★

★

★

 

★

★

★

Elkin et al. [18] (2011)

★

★

★

★

★

★

★

★

Ely et al. [26] (1999)

★

★

★

★

★★

★

★

★

Goldenbaum et al. [36] (2008)

★

★

★

★

 

★

★

★

Hickson et al. [27] (2002)

★

★

★

★

★★

★

★

★

Khaliq et al. [19] (2005)

★

★

★

★

★★

★

★

★

Pande et al. [37] (2013)

★

★

★

★

 

★

★

★

Papadakis et al. [20] (2008)

★

★

★

★

★★

★

★

★

St George[32] (2003)

★

★

★

★

 

★

★

★

Tamblyn et al. [33] (2007)

★

★

★

★

★★

★

★

★

Taragin et al. [28] (1992)

★

★

★

★

★

★

★

★

Weycker et al. [30] (2000)

★

★

★

★

★★

★

★

★

Case-control and Cross-sectional studies

 

Selection

Comparability

Exposure

 

Case definition

Representativeness of cases

Selection of controls

Definition of controls

Comparability of cases and controls

Ascertainment of exposure

Method of ascertainment for cases and controls

Non-response rate

Cardarelli et al. [16] (2004)

★

★

★

★

★★

★

★

★

Clay et al. [17] (2003)

★

★

★

★

★★

★

★

 

Kohatsu et al. [6] (2004)

★

★

★

★

★★

★

★

 

Morrison et al. [7] (1998)

★

★

★

★

★★

★

★

★

Papadakis et al. [8] (2004)

★

★

★

★

★★

★

★

 

Papadakis et al. [9] (2005)

★

★

★

★

★★

★

★

★

Yates et al. [22] (2010)

★

★

★

★

★★

★

★

 

Balch et al. [23] (2011)

  

★

★

★★

 

★

 

Chauhan et al. [25] (2005)

 

★

★

★

★★

 

★

 

Nash et al. [35] (2009)

  

★

★

★★

 

★

 

Nash et al. [34] (2009)

★

 

★

★

  

★

 

Unwin et al. [5] (2014)

★

★

★

★

★★

★

★

★

Wakeford et al. [21] (2011)

★

★

★

★

 

★

★

★

Weisman et al. [29] (1988)

 

★

★

★

★★

 

★

 

Wu et al. [31] (2009)

 

★

★

★

★★

 

★