|
Domain criterion
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
Score
|
Rating
|
|---|
|
1
|
Antonini et al. [35]
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
n/a
|
n/a
|
+
|
+
|
−
|
+
|
+
|
8
|
High
|
|
2
|
August et al. [49]
|
+
|
+
|
−
|
+
|
n/a
|
n/a
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
8
|
High
|
|
3
|
Barry et al. [32]
|
+
|
−
|
+
|
+
|
n/a
|
n/a
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
8
|
High
|
|
4
|
Bauermeister et al. [31]
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
n/a
|
n/a
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
9
|
High
|
|
5
|
Benedetto-Nasho & Tannock [25]
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
−
|
n/a
|
n/a
|
+
|
–
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
7
|
High
|
|
6
|
Biederman et al. [44]
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
n/a
|
n/a
|
+
|
+
|
–
|
+
|
+
|
8
|
High
|
|
7*
|
Biederman et al. [37]
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
−
|
+
|
10
|
High
|
|
8*
|
Biederman et al. [46]
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
−
|
+
|
10
|
High
|
|
9
|
Biederman et al. [40]
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
n/a
|
n/a
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
−
|
+
|
8
|
High
|
|
10
|
DuPaul et al. [5]
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
−
|
n/a
|
n/a
|
+
|
+
|
−
|
+
|
+
|
7
|
High
|
|
11
|
Efron et al. [41]
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
n/a
|
n/a
|
+
|
+
|
−
|
+
|
+
|
9
|
High
|
|
12*
|
Faraone et al. [18]
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
−
|
+
|
+
|
−
|
+
|
−
|
−
|
+
|
7
|
Medium
|
|
13
|
Faraone et al. [45]
|
+
|
+
|
–
|
+
|
n/a
|
n/a
|
+
|
+
|
–
|
+
|
+
|
7
|
High
|
|
14
|
Frick et al. [26]
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
–
|
n/a
|
n/a
|
–
|
–
|
+
|
+
|
–
|
5
|
Medium
|
|
15
|
Gremillion & Martel [36]
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
n/a
|
n/a
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
9
|
High
|
|
16
|
Greven et al. [50]
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
n/a
|
n/a
|
–
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
8
|
High
|
|
17
|
Hart et al. [19]
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
–
|
n/a
|
n/a
|
–
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
7
|
High
|
|
18
|
Kaufmann & Nuerk [20]
|
+
|
+
|
–
|
–
|
n/a
|
n/a
|
+
|
–
|
–
|
+
|
+
|
5
|
Medium
|
|
19
|
Kempton et al. [28]
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
–
|
n/a
|
n/a
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
–
|
+
|
7
|
High
|
|
20
|
Laasonen et al. [33]
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
n/a
|
n/a
|
–
|
+
|
–
|
+
|
–
|
6
|
Medium
|
|
21
|
Lamminmäki et al. [39]
|
+
|
+
|
–
|
+
|
n/a
|
n/a
|
+
|
+
|
–
|
+
|
+
|
7
|
High
|
|
22
|
Lewandowski et al. [21]
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
–
|
n/a
|
n/a
|
+
|
+
|
–
|
+
|
+
|
7
|
High
|
|
23*
|
Massetti et al. [38]
|
+
|
+
|
–
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
–
|
+
|
+
|
9
|
High
|
|
24
|
Mayes & Calhoun [42]
|
+
|
+
|
–
|
+
|
n/a
|
n/a
|
–
|
+
|
+
|
–
|
+
|
6
|
Medium
|
|
25
|
Mealer et al. [22]
|
+
|
+
|
–
|
–
|
n/a
|
n/a
|
+
|
+
|
–
|
+
|
+
|
6
|
Medium
|
|
26
|
Papaioannou et al. [48]
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
n/a
|
n/a
|
+
|
+
|
–
|
+
|
+
|
7
|
High
|
|
27
|
Penny et al. [29]
|
+
|
+
|
–
|
–
|
n/a
|
n/a
|
+
|
+
|
–
|
+
|
+
|
6
|
Medium
|
|
28
|
Roy-Byrne et al. [34]
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
n/a
|
n/a
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
9
|
High
|
|
29
|
Rucklidge & Tannock [23]
|
+
|
+
|
–
|
–
|
n/a
|
n/a
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
7
|
High
|
|
30
|
Schachar & Tannock [30]
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
–
|
n/a
|
n/a
|
–
|
+
|
–
|
+
|
+
|
6
|
Medium
|
|
31
|
Seidman et al. [24]
|
+
|
–
|
+
|
–
|
n/a
|
n/a
|
+
|
+
|
–
|
+
|
+
|
6
|
Medium
|
|
32
|
Thorell [27]
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
–
|
n/a
|
n/a
|
–
|
–
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
6
|
Medium
|
|
33
|
Todd et al. [43]
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
n/a
|
n/a
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
9
|
High
|
|
34
|
Zentall et al. [47]
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
n/a
|
n/a
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
9
|
High
|
- n/a, Not applicable; Domain criterion, the 11-question criteria used for quality appraisal; +, criteria fulfilled; –, criteria not fulfilled; *, Longitudinal studies; Scores for longitudinal studies: high quality >9, medium quality 5–8, low quality 0–4; Scores for cross-sectional studies: high quality >7, medium quality 4–6, low quality 0–3. Only the four longitudinal studies, indicated with the asterisk (*) fulfil the criteria in columns 5 and 6 of participant response rate and reason for participant drop-out
