Skip to content

Advertisement

You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more
Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Immunity and clinical efficacy of an inactivated enterovirus 71 vaccine in healthy Chinese children: a report of further observations

  • Longding Liu1,
  • Zhaojun Mo2,
  • Zhenglun Liang3,
  • Ying Zhang1,
  • Rongcheng Li2,
  • Kien Chai Ong4,
  • Kum Thong Wong4,
  • Erxia Yang1, 5,
  • Yanchun Che1,
  • Jingjing Wang1,
  • Chenghong Dong1,
  • Min Feng1,
  • Jing Pu1,
  • Lichun Wang1,
  • Yun Liao1,
  • Li Jiang1, 5,
  • Soon Hao Tan4,
  • Perera David6,
  • Teng Huang2,
  • Zhenxin Zhou1,
  • Xuanyi Wang7,
  • Jielai Xia8,
  • Lei Guo1,
  • Ling Wang8,
  • Zhongping Xie1,
  • Wei Cui1,
  • Qunying Mao3,
  • Yan Liang1,
  • Hongling Zhao1,
  • Ruixiong Na1,
  • Pingfang Cui1,
  • Haijing Shi1,
  • Junzhi Wang3Email author and
  • Qihan Li1Email author
Contributed equally
BMC Medicine201513:226

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-015-0448-7

Received: 30 March 2015

Accepted: 12 August 2015

Published: 17 September 2015

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
30 Mar 2015 Submitted Original manuscript
Author responded Author comments
Reviewed Reviewer Report
Reviewed Reviewer Report
Reviewed Reviewer Report
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
Author responded Author comments
Reviewed Reviewer Report
Reviewed Reviewer Report
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
Author responded Author comments
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
Author responded Author comments
Reviewed Reviewer Report
Resubmission - Version 7
Submitted Manuscript version 7
Author responded Author comments
Resubmission - Version 8
Submitted Manuscript version 8
Publishing
12 Aug 2015 Editorially accepted
17 Sep 2015 Article published 10.1186/s12916-015-0448-7

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Yunnan Key Laboratory of Vaccine Research and Development on Severe Infectious Diseases, Institute of Medical Biology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College
(2)
Guangxi Province Centres for Disease Control and Prevention
(3)
National Institutes for Food and Drug Control
(4)
Departments of Biomedical Science and Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya
(5)
Jiangsu Convac Biotechnology Co., Ltd
(6)
Institute of Health & Community Medicine, University Malaysia Sarawak
(7)
Key Laboratory of Medical Molecular Virology, Ministries of Education and Health, Institute of Biological Sciences, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University
(8)
Department of Health Statistics, Fourth Military Medical University

Advertisement