Skip to main content

Table 1 Sample characteristics

From: Is dying in hospital better than home in incurable cancer and what factors influence this? A population-based study

 

All

Home death

Hospital death

 

(n = 352)

(n = 175)

(n = 177)

Patient’s gender

   

 Male

192 (54.5 %)

94 (53.7 %)

98 (55.4 %)

 Female

160 (45.5 %)

81 (46.3 %)

79 (44.6 %)

Patient’s age

   

 Median in years (IQR)

76 (67–83)

76 (66–83)

76 (67–83.5)

Type of cancer (underlying cause of death)

   

 Digestive

105 (29.8 %)

59 (33.7 %)

46 (26.0 %)

 Respiratory and intra-thoracic organs

80 (22.7 %)

40 (22.9 %)

40 (22.6 %)

 Eye, brain, and other parts of the central nervous system

13 (3.7 %)

11 (6.3 %)

2 (1.1 %)

 Breast

18 (5.1 %)

9 (5.1 %)

9 (5.1 %)

 Lymphoid, haematopoietic, and related tissue

26 (7.4 %)

8 (4.6 %)

18 (10.2 %)

 Genitourinary

67 (19.0 %)

25 (14.3 %)

42 (23.7 %)

 Unspecified and other

43 (12.2 %)

23 (13.1 %)

20 (11.3 %)

Mobility at 3 months to death (EQ-5D)

   

 No problems

95 (28.4 %)

42 (25.6 %)

53 (31.0 %)

 Some problems

211 (63.0 %)

106 (64.6 %)

105 (61.4 %)

 Confined to bed

29 (8.7 %)

16 (9.8 %)

13 (7.6 %)

Self-care at 3 months to death (EQ-5D)

   

 No problems

148 (44.7 %)

68 (42.2 %)

80 (47.1 %)

 Some problems

128 (38.7 %)

68 (42.2 %)

60 (35.3 %)

 Unable to wash/dress her/himself

55 (16.6 %)

25 (15.5 %)

30 (17.6 %)

Usual activities at 3 months to death (EQ-5D)

   

 No problems

76 (22.8 %)

31 (18.8 %)

45 (26.6 %)

 Some problems

152 (45.5 %)

82 (49.7 %)

70 (41.4 %)

 Unable to perform usual activities

106 (31.7 %)

52 (31.5 %)

54 (32.0 %)

Patient’s country of birth

   

 UK/Ireland

288 (81.8 %)

142 (81.1 %)

146 (82.5 %)

 Elsewhere

64 (18.2 %)

33 (18.9 %)

31 (17.5 %)

Patient’s ethnicity

   

 White British/Irish

291 (84.6 %)

145 (84.8 %)

146 (84.4 %)

 White other/unspecified

21 (6.1 %)

13 (7.6 %)

8 (4.6 %)

 Other

32 (9.3 %)

13 (7.6 %)

19 (11.0 %)

IMD 2010 (patient’s residence area) a

   

 5th quintile (least deprived)

89 (25.3 %)

46 (26.3 %)

43 (24.3 %)

 4th quintile

69 (19.6 %)

41 (23.4 %)

28 (15.8 %)

 3rd quintile

55 (15.6 %)

31 (17.7 %)

24 (13.6 %)

 2nd quintile

85 (24.1 %)

35 (20.0 %)

50 (28.2 %)

 1st quintile (most deprived)

54 (15.3 %)

22 (12.6 %)

32 (18.1 %)

Patient’s marital status

   

 Married/with partner

199 (58.0 %)

117 (68.8 %)

82 (47.4 %)

 Widowed

86 (25.1 %)

34 (20.0 %)

52 (30.1 %)

 Divorced/separated

25 (7.3 %)

9 (5.3 %)

16 (9.2 %)

 Never married

33 (9.6 %)

10 (5.9 %)

23 (13.3 %)

Patient’s living with relatives

   

 Yes

249 (71.6 %)

145 (83.8 %)

104 (59.4 %)

 No

99 (28.4 %)

28 (16.2 %)

71 (40.6 %)

Patient’s preference for PoD

   

 Home

262 (83.7 %)

168 (97.7 %)

94 (66.7 %)

 Other or no preference

51 (16.3 %)

4 (2.3 %)

47 (33.3 %)

Relative’s gender

   

 Male

118 (33.8 %)

53 (30.6 %)

65 (36.9 %)

 Female

231 (66.2 %)

120 (69.4 %)

111 (63.1 %)

Relative’s age

   

 Median in years (IQR)

59 (49–70)

60 (50–71)

57 (49–68)

Relative’s relationship to patient

   

 Spouse/partner

147 (41.9 %)

85 (48.6 %)

62 (35.2 %)

 Son/daughter

142 (40.5 %)

75 (42.9 %)

67 (38.1 %)

 Brother/sister

20 (5.7 %)

4 (2.3 %)

16 (9.1 %)

 Other

42 (12.0 %)

11 (6.3 %)

31 (17.6 %)

Relative’s preference for PoD at 3 months to death

   

 Home

215 (61.8 %)

159 (91.9 %)

56 (32.0 %)

 Other or no preference

133 (38.2 %)

14 (8.1 %)

119 (68.0 %)

Change in relative’s preference for PoD in 3 months prior death

   

 Yes

42 (12.7 %)

16 (9.5 %)

26 (16.0 %)

 No

289 (87.3 %)

153 (90.5 %)

136 (84.0 %)

  1. a Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) 2010 national quintile of the area of last residence of the deceased. This information was provided by the Office for National Statistics based on death registration information of the patient’s lower layer super output area of residence (LSOA). The IMD 2010 score is a measure based on 38 indicators, chosen to cover a broad range of economic, social, and housing issues, into a single relative deprivation score for each LSOA in England [34]. The different domains are combined using appropriate weights to calculate the IMD 2010 score, an overall measure of multiple deprivation experienced by people living in the respective area. This represents unmet needs caused by lack of resources of all kinds (income, employment, health and disability, education skills and training, barriers to housing and other services, crime and living environment)
  2. Percentages may not add to 100 % due to rounding
  3. IQR, Interquartile range; PoD, Place of death