Skip to main content

Table 1 Levels of evidence and grades of recommendation (according to the ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for fertility preservation in cancer patients [11])

From: Cancer and fertility preservation: international recommendations from an expert meeting

Levels of evidence
I Evidence from at least one large randomized, controlled trial of good methodological quality (low potential for bias) or meta-analyses of well-conducted randomized trials without heterogeneity
II Small randomized trials or large randomized trials with a suspicion of bias (lower methodological quality) or meta-analyses of such trials or of trials with demonstrated heterogeneity
III Prospective cohort studies
IV Retrospective cohort studies or case–control studies
V Studies without control group, case reports, experts opinions
Grade of recommendation
A Strong evidence for efficacy with a substantial clinical benefit, strongly recommended
B Strong or moderate evidence for efficacy but with a limited clinical benefit, generally recommended
C Insufficient evidence for efficacy or benefit does not outweigh the risk or the disadvantages (adverse events, costs, etc.), optional
D Moderate evidence against efficacy or for adverse outcome, generally not recommended
E Strong evidence against efficacy or for adverse outcome, never recommended