Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Wasted research when systematic reviews fail to provide a complete and up-to-date evidence synthesis: the example of lung cancer

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
3 Sep 2015 Submitted Original manuscript
2 Oct 2015 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Per Vandvik
3 Nov 2015 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sharon Straus
3 Dec 2015 Author responded Author comments - Perrine Créquit
Resubmission - Version 2
3 Dec 2015 Submitted Manuscript version 2
31 Dec 2015 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Per Vandvik
4 Jan 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sharon Straus
6 Jan 2016 Author responded Author comments - Perrine Créquit
Resubmission - Version 3
6 Jan 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
7 Jan 2016 Editorially accepted
20 Jan 2016 Article published 10.1186/s12916-016-0555-0

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement