Wasted research when systematic reviews fail to provide a complete and up-to-date evidence synthesis: the example of lung cancer
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|3 Sep 2015||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|2 Oct 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Per Vandvik|
|3 Nov 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sharon Straus|
|3 Dec 2015||Author responded||Author comments - Perrine Créquit|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|3 Dec 2015||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|31 Dec 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Per Vandvik|
|4 Jan 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sharon Straus|
|6 Jan 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Perrine Créquit|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|6 Jan 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|7 Jan 2016||Editorially accepted|
|20 Jan 2016||Article published||10.1186/s12916-016-0555-0|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.