Multivariable odds ratio (95 % CI)
|
All data
|
Control arm patients only
|
Isoniazid arm patients only
|
Ethambutol arm patients only
|
---|
Control
|
Reference
| | | |
---|
Isoniazid
|
1.81 (1.18, 2.78)
| | | |
Ethambutol
|
2.88 (1.92, 4.33)
| | | |
|
p <0.001
| | | |
BMI per 1 kg/m2
|
0.92 (0.87, 0.98)
|
0.93 (0.82, 1.05)
|
0.95 (0.85, 1.05)
|
0.90 (0.83, 0.99)
|
p = 0.004
|
p = 0.193
|
p = 0.286
|
p = 0.027
|
History of smoking
|
1.63 (1.15, 2.31)
|
2.12 (0.99, 4.53)
|
2.34 (1.23, 4.46)
|
1.15 (0.69, 1.92)
|
p = 0.005
|
p = 0.046
|
p = 0.007
|
p = 0.592
|
HIV positive
|
2.93 (1.69, 5.08)
|
2.64 (0.90, 7.78)
|
1.95 (0.72, 5.28)
|
4.46 (1.79, 11.09)
|
p <0.001
|
p = 0.100
|
p = 0.210
|
p = 0.002
|
TTP on MGIT (per 0.1 log10(day))
|
0.97 (0.90, 1.05)
|
1.17 (1.03, 1.32)a
|
1.02 (0.89, 1.17)
|
0.84 (0.74, 0.95)
|
p = 0.439
|
p = 0.024
|
p = 0.789
|
p = 0.003
|
Male gender
|
1.69 (1.13, 2.53)
|
1.10 (0.48, 2.55)
|
1.94 (0.94, 3.98)
|
2.09 (1.13, 3.85)
|
p = 0.009
|
p = 0.817
|
p = 0.060
|
p = 0.014
|
Cavities on X-ray
|
1.93 (1.22, 3.05)
|
1.62 (0.62, 4.19)
|
2.82 (1.15, 6.94)
|
1.75 (0.89, 3.41)
|
p = 0.003
|
p = 0.302
|
p = 0.013
|
p = 0.091
|
-
aThis association (p = 0.024) indicates a higher probability of an unfavourable outcome with higher TTP on MGIT, indicating a lower bacillary load which is biologically counter-intuitive. This is a modest odds ratio with a fairly wide confidence interval—similar results are seen in the univariable model. Due to the multiplicity in the number of tests done to evaluate baseline predictors this is therefore likely a chance finding