Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Going “social” to access experimental and potentially life-saving treatment: an assessment of the policy and online patient advocacy environment for expanded access

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
28 Oct 2015 Submitted Original manuscript
30 Oct 2015 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Paul Wicks
25 Nov 2015 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Y. Tony Yang
16 Dec 2015 Author responded Author comments - Tim Mackey
Resubmission - Version 2
16 Dec 2015 Submitted Manuscript version 2
17 Dec 2015 Author responded Author comments - Tim Mackey
17 Dec 2015 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Paul Wicks
Resubmission - Version 3
17 Dec 2015 Submitted Manuscript version 3
11 Jan 2016 Author responded Author comments - Tim Mackey
Resubmission - Version 4
11 Jan 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
13 Jan 2016 Editorially accepted
2 Feb 2016 Article published 10.1186/s12916-016-0568-8

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement