Going “social” to access experimental and potentially life-saving treatment: an assessment of the policy and online patient advocacy environment for expanded access
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|28 Oct 2015||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|30 Oct 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Paul Wicks|
|25 Nov 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Y. Tony Yang|
|16 Dec 2015||Author responded||Author comments - Tim Mackey|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|16 Dec 2015||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|17 Dec 2015||Author responded||Author comments - Tim Mackey|
|17 Dec 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Paul Wicks|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|17 Dec 2015||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|11 Jan 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Tim Mackey|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|11 Jan 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|13 Jan 2016||Editorially accepted|
|2 Feb 2016||Article published||10.1186/s12916-016-0568-8|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.