Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Fig. 5 | BMC Medicine

Fig. 5

From: Impact of interventions to improve the quality of peer review of biomedical journals: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Fig. 5

a Impact of the “open” review interventions versus anonymous process (anonymous to reviewers, authors or public): standardized mean difference (SMD) of the quality of the peer review report. b Impact of the “open” review interventions versus anonymous process (anonymous to reviewers, authors or public): odds ratio (OR) of peer reviewers’ recommendation for rejection. c Impact of the “open” review interventions versus anonymous process (anonymous to reviewers, authors or public): standardized mean difference (SMD) of the time peer reviewers spent on the peer review

Back to article page