This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Is there an added value of faecal calprotectin and haemoglobin in the diagnostic work-up for primary care patients suspected of significant colorectal disease? A cross-sectional diagnostic study
- Sjoerd G. Elias†1Email author,
- Liselotte Kok†1,
- Niek J. de Wit1,
- Ben J. M Witteman2,
- Jelle G. Goedhard3,
- Mariëlle J. L. Romberg-Camps4,
- Jean W. M. Muris5 and
- Karel G. M. Moons1
© The Author(s). 2016
Received: 11 June 2016
Accepted: 31 August 2016
Published: 26 September 2016
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|11 Jun 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Author responded||Author comments|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|31 Aug 2016||Editorially accepted|
|26 Sep 2016||Article published||10.1186/s12916-016-0684-5|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.