Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Can screening instruments accurately determine poor outcome risk in adults with recent onset low back pain? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
30 Oct 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
10 Nov 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jaro Karppinen
18 Nov 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Peter Kent
21 Nov 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Martin Underwood
7 Dec 2016 Author responded Author comments - Emma Karran
Resubmission - Version 2
7 Dec 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
12 Dec 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Peter Kent
13 Dec 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jaro Karppinen
15 Dec 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Martin Underwood
20 Dec 2016 Author responded Author comments - Emma Karran
Resubmission - Version 3
20 Dec 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
20 Dec 2016 Editorially accepted
19 Jan 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12916-016-0774-4

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement