Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Pain relief that matters to patients: systematic review of empirical studies assessing the minimum clinically important difference in acute pain

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
27 Aug 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
29 Sep 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Andrew McLachlan
29 Sep 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Benjamin Friedman
15 Oct 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Peter Giannoudis
8 Nov 2016 Author responded Author comments - Mette Olsen
Resubmission - Version 2
8 Nov 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
5 Dec 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Peter Giannoudis
19 Dec 2016 Author responded Author comments - Mette Olsen
Resubmission - Version 3
19 Dec 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 3
22 Dec 2016 Author responded Author comments - Mette Olsen
Resubmission - Version 4
22 Dec 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
23 Dec 2016 Editorially accepted
20 Feb 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12916-016-0775-3

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement