Open Peer Review Reports for: Potential predatory and legitimate biomedical journals: can you tell the difference? A cross-sectional comparison
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 11 Nov 2016 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 6 Dec 2016 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jelte Wicherts |
| 10 Dec 2016 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Bhushan Patwardhan |
| 21 Dec 2016 | Author responded | Author comments - Larissa Shamseer |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 21 Dec 2016 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| Publishing | ||
| 9 Jan 2017 | Editorially accepted | |
| 16 Mar 2017 | Article published | 10.1186/s12916-017-0785-9 |
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.
