Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Osteoprotegerin and breast cancer risk by hormone receptor subtype: a nested case-control study in the EPIC cohort

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
6 Sep 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
30 Sep 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Allan Lipton
26 Nov 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Linda Connelly
16 Dec 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Molin Wang
20 Dec 2016 Author responded Author comments - Renée Fortner
Resubmission - Version 2
20 Dec 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
21 Dec 2016 Author responded Author comments - Renée Fortner
Resubmission - Version 3
21 Dec 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 3
29 Dec 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Linda Connelly
9 Jan 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Molin Wang
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
10 Jan 2017 Editorially accepted
8 Feb 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12916-017-0786-8

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement