Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Perspectives on model forecasts of the 2014–2015 Ebola epidemic in West Africa: lessons and the way forward

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
18 Nov 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
6 Dec 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Glenn Webb
9 Dec 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Robert Smith
17 Dec 2016 Author responded Author comments - Gerardo Chowell
Resubmission - Version 2
17 Dec 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
21 Dec 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Robert Smith
3 Jan 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Glenn Webb
6 Jan 2017 Author responded Author comments - Gerardo Chowell
Resubmission - Version 3
6 Jan 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
24 Jan 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Robert Smith
25 Jan 2017 Author responded Author comments - Gerardo Chowell
Resubmission - Version 4
25 Jan 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
7 Feb 2017 Editorially accepted
1 Mar 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12916-017-0811-y

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement