Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Incentivised chronic disease management and the inverse equity hypothesis: findings from a longitudinal analysis of Scottish primary care practice-level data

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
30 Aug 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
28 Sep 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mark Ashworth
27 Oct 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Herngchia Chiu
15 Nov 2016 Author responded Author comments - Richard Lowrie
Resubmission - Version 2
15 Nov 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
6 Dec 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mark Ashworth
28 Dec 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Herngchia Chiu
31 Jan 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sanja Lujic
20 Feb 2017 Author responded Author comments - Richard Lowrie
Resubmission - Version 3
20 Feb 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
26 Feb 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Herngchia Chiu
2 Mar 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sanja Lujic
7 Mar 2017 Author responded Author comments - Richard Lowrie
Resubmission - Version 4
7 Mar 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
7 Mar 2017 Editorially accepted
11 Apr 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12916-017-0833-5

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement