Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: The relative importance of large problems far away versus small problems closer to home: insights into limiting the spread of antimicrobial resistance in England

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
7 Dec 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
29 Dec 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Gianpaolo Scalia-Tomba
5 Jan 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Belinda Ostrowsky
12 Jan 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David Lye
9 Feb 2017 Author responded Author comments - Tjibbe Donker
Resubmission - Version 2
9 Feb 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
2 Mar 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Gianpaolo Scalia-Tomba
9 Mar 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David Lye
22 Mar 2017 Author responded Author comments - Tjibbe Donker
Resubmission - Version 3
22 Mar 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
24 Mar 2017 Editorially accepted
27 Apr 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12916-017-0844-2

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement