This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
The relative importance of large problems far away versus small problems closer to home: insights into limiting the spread of antimicrobial resistance in England
- Tjibbe Donker1, 2, 3Email authorView ORCID ID profile,
- Katherine L. Henderson3,
- Katie L. Hopkins1, 3,
- Andrew R. Dodgson4, 5,
- Stephanie Thomas6,
- Derrick W. Crook1, 2, 3, 7,
- Tim E. A. Peto†1, 2, 7,
- Alan P. Johnson†1, 3,
- Neil Woodford†1, 3,
- A. Sarah Walker†1, 2, 7 and
- Julie V. Robotham†1, 3
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 7 December 2016
Accepted: 24 March 2017
Published: 27 April 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|7 Dec 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|29 Dec 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Gianpaolo Scalia-Tomba|
|5 Jan 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Belinda Ostrowsky|
|12 Jan 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - David Lye|
|9 Feb 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Tjibbe Donker|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|9 Feb 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|2 Mar 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Gianpaolo Scalia-Tomba|
|9 Mar 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - David Lye|
|22 Mar 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Tjibbe Donker|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|22 Mar 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|24 Mar 2017||Editorially accepted|
|27 Apr 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12916-017-0844-2|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.