Skip to main content

Table 1 Selected baseline characteristics of comparative randomized controlled trials and matched observational studies

From: Percutaneous intervention versus coronary artery bypass graft surgery in left main coronary artery stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Trial

Year

Age, years

Male, %

Diabetes, %

Hypertension, %

Dyslipidemia, %

Current smoker, %

Prior PCI, %

Prior MI, %

No.

FU, years

EF, %

Study period

Adjusting method

LE MANS [24]

2016

61.3 ± 8.4

73

17

70

60

NA

NA

33

105

10

53.7 ± 6.7

2001–2004

Randomization

PRECOMBAT [10]

2015

62.7 ± 9.5

77

30

51.3

40

27.7

12.7

6.7

600

5

60.8 ± 8.5

2004–2009

Randomization

SYNTAX [11]

2014

65.6 ± 10.1

75.6

25.6

62.4

75.4

24

NA

25.4

705

5

NA

2005–2007

Randomization

Boudriot et al. [23]

2011

69 (63–73)

77

33

82

64

28

NA

14

201

5

65 (55–68)

2003–2009

Randomization

EXCEL [12]

2016

65.9 ± 9.5

77.5

28

73.9

69.3

20.8

15.9

16.9

1905

3

57.3 ± 9.0

2010–2014

Randomization

NOBLE [13]

2016

66.2 ± 9.4

76

15

66

78

22

20

NA

1184

5

60 (52–64)

2008–2015

Randomization

Zheng et al. [14]

2016

62.2 ± 9.1

82

31

64.3

59.1

53.6

9.7

38.1

4046

3

60.2 ± 8.2

2004–2010

Propensity score adjustment

Yu et al. [33]

2016

64 (57–70)

82.5

28.7

58.9

34.6

44.9

6.8

21.7

922

7.1

62 (54–68)

2003–2009

Propensity score adjustment

Lu et al. [32]

2016

69 ± 11

85.5

46

83

50

67

NA

NA

478

4.3

49 ± 12

2004–2010

Propensity score adjustment

Wei et al. [41]

2016

71.0 ± 5.9

79

45.2

72.6

21.0

58.1

NA

NA

126

1.3

48.8 ± 7.5

2012–2013

Multivariate adjusted

IRIS-MAIN registry-1 [15]

2016

61 ± 10

75.3

31.5

51.8

33.4

33.1

10.8

15.5

954

9.7

58 ± 11

1995–2002

Multivariate adjusted

IRIS-MAIN registry-2 [15]

2016

64 ± 9

74.4

38.4

54.8

34.6

27.2

12.3

13.3

1901

5.6

56 ± 11

2003–2006

Multivariate adjusted

IRIS-MAIN registry-3 [15]

2016

65 ± 9

79.1

42.5

65.9

50.3

25.9

13.4

12.2

2362

3

55 ± 11

2007–2013

Multivariate adjusted

Jeong et al. [28]

2013

60.8 ± 10

79.2

30.8

49.1

1.7

20.1

18.2

6.9

318

4.7

NA

2001–2009

Propensity matching

DELTA registry [16]

2012

66.8 ± 10.5

65

31.6

68.1

65.6

43

16.8

NA

1204

3.5

53.2 ± 11.4

2002–2006

Propensity matching

CREDO-Kyoto 2 [40]

2012

69.4 ± 9.2

77

45

85

NA

25

NA

16

1005

3

60.2 ± 13.4

2005–2007

Multivariate adjusted

Chang et al. [27]

2012

64 ± 8.7

72.6

35.8

53.2

33.2

26.3

14.7

12.6

380

4.2

40.1 ± 27.8

2003–2009

Propensity matching

Yi et al. [29]

2012

64.2 ± 8.3

82.7

31.3

62.5

NA

NA

NA

NA

256

5

NA

2003–2007

Propensity matching

CUSTOMIZE registry [25]

2011

65.3 ± 10.5

76.3

33.5

68.2

54.3

48

22

31.2

346

3

52.1 ± 9.0

2002–2011

Propensity matching

Rittger et al. [34]

2011

65 ± 7

78

45

84

94

NA

22

18

286

1

55 ± 14

2004–2007

Propensity score adjustment

Asan-Multivessel Registry [31]

2011

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

550

5.6

NA

2003–2005

Propensity score adjustment

Kang et al. [30]

2010

64.3 ± 10.3

71.4

41.9

67.6

52.4

48.6

NA

NA

210

2.8

53.7 ± 13.1

2003–2006

Propensity matching

Mäkikallio et al. [39]

2009

70 ± 9

80

17

46

NA

18

3

NA

287

1

54 ± 11

2005–2007

Multivariate adjusted

MAIN-COMPARE registry [26]

2008

64 (56–70)

71.2

33

50

30.1

27.1

15.1

10

1084

3

61 (55–66)

2000–2006

Propensity matching

Ghenim et al. [35]

2009

79.6 ± 3.5

71.7

23.6

65.1

41.5

24.5

20.7

19.8

211

1

NA

2004–2006

Propensity score adjustment

White et al. [36]

2008

69.4 ± 1.7

77

27

76

77

17

NA

NA

353

2

54 ± 11

2003–2007

Propensity score adjustment

Rodes-Cabau et al. [37]

2008

82 ± 2

63

26

72

82

6

8

59

249

2

56 ± 14

2002–2008

Propensity score adjustment

Palmerini et al. [38]

2007

78 (75–88)

66

26

73

47

39

NA

NA

259

2

53 (25–78)

2003–2006

Propensity score adjustment

  1. Values are mean, median (interquartile range) or %. EF ejection fraction, FU follow-up, MI myocardial infarction, NA not available, PCI percutaneous coronary intervention
  2. Expanded study abbreviations are as follows: CREDO-Kyoto 2 = the Coronary Revascularization Demonstrating Outcome Study in Kyoto (CREDO-Kyoto) PCI/CABG Registry Cohort-2; CUSTOMIZE = the Appraise a Customized Strategy for Left Main Revascularization Registry; DELTA = the drug-eluting stent for left main coronary artery disease registry; EXCEL = the Evaluation of XIENCE versus Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery for Effectiveness of Left Main Revascularization trial; IRIS-MAIN = Interventional Research Incorporation Society-Left MAIN Revascularization registry; LE MANS = Study of UnprotectedLeft Main Stenting Versus Bypass Surgery; MAIN-COMPARE = Revascularization for Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis: Comparison of Percutaneous Coronary Angioplasty versus Surgical Revascularization registry; NOBLE = The Nordic-Baltic-British left main revascularisation study; PRECOMBAT = the Premier of Randomized Comparison of Bypass Surgery versus Angioplasty Using Sirolimus-Eluting Stent in Patients with Left Main Coronary Artery Disease trial; SYNTAX = the other Synergy between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with Taxus and Cardiac Surgery trial