From: A cluster-randomized trial to reduce caesarean delivery rates in Quebec: cost-effectiveness analysis
Model 1: BMLM (crude) | Model 2: BMLM (adjusted) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Coef. (ß) | Std. Err. | 95% CI | P value | Coef. (ß) | Std. Err. | 95% CI | P value | |
All participantsc (N = 105,351 patients; 32 hospitals)c | ||||||||
Effects (CS) | −0.009 | 0.005 | (−0.019 to 0.002) | 0.096 | −0.005 | 0.005 | (−0.015 to 0.004) | 0.288 |
Costs ($) | −185 | 50 | (−283 to −86) | <0.001 | −180 | 49 | (−277 to −83) | <0.001 |
Low-risk subgroupd (N = 49,281 patients; 32 hospitals) | ||||||||
Effects (CS) | −0.013 | 0.005 | (−0.023 to −0.003) | 0.013 | −0.014 | 0.005 | (−0.024 to −0.004) | 0.005 |
Costs ($) | −210 | 63 | (−334 to −87) | 0.001 | −226 | 62 | (−348 to −105) | <0.001 |
High-risk subgroupd (N = 56,070 patients; 32 hospitals) | ||||||||
Effects (CS) | 0.009 | 0.008 | (−0.007 to 0.024) | 0.291 | 0.008 | 0.008 | (−0.008 to 0.024) | 0.307 |
Costs ($) | −102 | 76 | (−250 to 47) | 0.180 | −97 | 75 | (−243 to 49) | 0.193 |