Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Consistency and sources of divergence in recommendations on screening with questionnaires for presently experienced health problems or symptoms: a comparison of recommendations from the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care, UK National Screening Committee, and US Preventive Services Task Force

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
7 Dec 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
20 Dec 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Karsten Jörgensen
7 Feb 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jennifer Croswell
6 Mar 2017 Author responded Author comments - Brett Thombs
Resubmission - Version 2
6 Mar 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
7 Mar 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Karsten Jörgensen
5 Apr 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jennifer Croswell
10 Apr 2017 Author responded Author comments - Brett Thombs
Resubmission - Version 3
10 Apr 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
20 Jun 2017 Author responded Author comments - Brett Thombs
Resubmission - Version 4
20 Jun 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
26 Jun 2017 Editorially accepted
9 Aug 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12916-017-0903-8

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement