Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: How accurate is the ‘Surprise Question’ at identifying patients at the end of life? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
1 Mar 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
17 Mar 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Alvin Moss
23 Mar 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kirsty Boyd
7 Apr 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Evangelos Kontopantelis
5 May 2017 Author responded Author comments - Nicola White
Resubmission - Version 2
5 May 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
24 May 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Alvin Moss
26 May 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Evangelos Kontopantelis
8 Jun 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kirsty Boyd
30 Jun 2017 Author responded Author comments - Nicola White
Resubmission - Version 3
30 Jun 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
30 Jun 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Evangelos Kontopantelis
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
3 Jul 2017 Editorially accepted
2 Aug 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12916-017-0907-4

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement