Core competencies for scientific editors of biomedical journals: consensus statement
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|23 Mar 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|24 Apr 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sonia Vasconcelos|
|26 Apr 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Hilda Bastian|
|8 May 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Dominique Griffon|
|14 Jun 2017||Author responded||Author comments - David Moher|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|14 Jun 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|9 Jul 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sonia Vasconcelos|
|28 Jul 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Hilda Bastian|
|7 Aug 2017||Author responded||Author comments - David Moher|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|7 Aug 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|9 Aug 2017||Editorially accepted|
|11 Sep 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12916-017-0927-0|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.