Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: A randomised trial of the influence of racial stereotype bias on examiners’ scores, feedback and recollections in undergraduate clinical exams

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
24 May 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
21 Jun 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Danette McKinley
23 Jun 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Karen Stegers-Jager
23 Jul 2017 Author responded Author comments - Peter Yeates
Resubmission - Version 2
23 Jul 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
8 Aug 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Karen Stegers-Jager
10 Aug 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Danette McKinley
21 Aug 2017 Author responded Author comments - Peter Yeates
Resubmission - Version 3
21 Aug 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
5 Sep 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Karen Stegers-Jager
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
11 Sep 2017 Editorially accepted
25 Oct 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12916-017-0943-0

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement