This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
A randomised trial of the influence of racial stereotype bias on examiners’ scores, feedback and recollections in undergraduate clinical exams
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 24 May 2017
Accepted: 11 September 2017
Published: 25 October 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|24 May 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|21 Jun 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Danette McKinley|
|23 Jun 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Karen Stegers-Jager|
|23 Jul 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Peter Yeates|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|23 Jul 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|8 Aug 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Karen Stegers-Jager|
|10 Aug 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Danette McKinley|
|21 Aug 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Peter Yeates|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|21 Aug 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|5 Sep 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Karen Stegers-Jager|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|11 Sep 2017||Editorially accepted|
|25 Oct 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12916-017-0943-0|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.