This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Simulations for designing and interpreting intervention trials in infectious diseases
- M. Elizabeth Halloran1, 2Email authorView ORCID ID profile,
- Kari Auranen3,
- Sarah Baird4,
- Nicole E. Basta5,
- Steven E. Bellan6,
- Ron Brookmeyer7,
- Ben S. Cooper8,
- Victor DeGruttola9,
- James P. Hughes2,
- Justin Lessler10,
- Eric T. Lofgren11,
- Ira M. Longini12,
- Jukka-Pekka Onnela9,
- Berk Özler13,
- George R. Seage14,
- Thomas A. Smith15, 16,
- Alessandro Vespignani17,
- Emilia Vynnycky18, 19 and
- Marc Lipsitch14
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 10 October 2017
Accepted: 5 December 2017
Published: 29 December 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|10 Oct 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|31 Oct 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Thomas Churcher|
|6 Nov 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Martial Ndeffo Mbah|
|9 Nov 2017||Author responded||Author comments - M Elizabeth Halloran|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|9 Nov 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|5 Dec 2017||Editorially accepted|
|29 Dec 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12916-017-0985-3|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.