Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: The perceived organizational impact of the gender gap across a Canadian department of medicine and proposed strategies to combat it: a qualitative study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
16 Oct 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
4 Nov 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Pavel Ovseiko
27 Nov 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mats Brommels
9 Dec 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Carol Bates
13 Jan 2018 Author responded Author comments - Reena Pattani
Resubmission - Version 2
13 Jan 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 2
25 Jan 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mats Brommels
17 Feb 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Carol Bates
21 Feb 2018 Author responded Author comments - Reena Pattani
Resubmission - Version 3
21 Feb 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
28 Feb 2018 Editorially accepted
10 Apr 2018 Article published 10.1186/s12916-018-1032-8

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement