The perceived organizational impact of the gender gap across a Canadian department of medicine and proposed strategies to combat it: a qualitative study
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|16 Oct 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|4 Nov 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Pavel Ovseiko|
|27 Nov 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Mats Brommels|
|9 Dec 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Carol Bates|
|13 Jan 2018||Author responded||Author comments - Reena Pattani|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|13 Jan 2018||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|25 Jan 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Mats Brommels|
|17 Feb 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Carol Bates|
|21 Feb 2018||Author responded||Author comments - Reena Pattani|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|21 Feb 2018||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|28 Feb 2018||Editorially accepted|
|10 Apr 2018||Article published||10.1186/s12916-018-1032-8|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.