Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Real-world evidence: How pragmatic are randomized controlled trials labeled as pragmatic?

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
30 Nov 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
8 Dec 2017 Author responded Author comments - Rafael Dal-Ré
Resubmission - Version 2
8 Dec 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
2 Jan 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Merrick Zwarenstein
3 Jan 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Shaun Treweek
4 Jan 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Russell Glasgow
9 Jan 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Elaine Morrato
19 Jan 2018 Author responded Author comments - Rafael Dal-Ré
Resubmission - Version 3
19 Jan 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 3
2 Mar 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Elaine Morrato
14 Mar 2018 Author responded Author comments - Rafael Dal-Ré
Resubmission - Version 4
14 Mar 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
15 Mar 2018 Editorially accepted
3 Apr 2018 Article published 10.1186/s12916-018-1038-2

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement