Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Using flawed, uncertain, proximate and sparse (FUPS) data in the context of complexity: learning from the case of child mental health

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
19 Feb 2018 Submitted Original manuscript
28 Feb 2018 Author responded Author comments - Miranda Wolpert
Resubmission - Version 2
28 Feb 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 2
17 Mar 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Chrysanthi Papoutsi
29 Mar 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kimberly Hoagwood
2 Apr 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kelly Kelleher
9 Apr 2018 Author responded Author comments - Miranda Wolpert
Resubmission - Version 3
9 Apr 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 3
11 Apr 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Chrysanthi Papoutsi
11 Apr 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kelly Kelleher
18 Apr 2018 Author responded Author comments - Miranda Wolpert
Resubmission - Version 4
18 Apr 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
17 May 2018 Editorially accepted
18 Jun 2018 Article published 10.1186/s12916-018-1079-6

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement