Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Being pragmatic about healthcare complexity: our experiences applying complexity theory and pragmatism to health services research

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
31 Jan 2018 Submitted Original manuscript
27 Feb 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Robin Durie
6 Mar 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - James Shaw
15 Mar 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Elizabeth McGill
19 Mar 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Marjolein van der Marck
18 Apr 2018 Author responded Author comments - Katrina Long
Resubmission - Version 2
18 Apr 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 2
25 Apr 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Elizabeth McGill
2 May 2018 Author responded Author comments - Katrina Long
2 May 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - James Shaw
Resubmission - Version 3
2 May 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 3
14 May 2018 Author responded Author comments - Katrina Long
Resubmission - Version 4
14 May 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
25 May 2018 Editorially accepted
20 Jun 2018 Article published 10.1186/s12916-018-1087-6

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement