Skip to main content

Table 4 Risk of bias in non-randomized studies

From: Efficacy, effectiveness and safety of vaccination against human papillomavirus in males: a systematic review

Study

Confounding

Selection bias

Classification of intervention

Deviation from intervention

Missing data

Outcome measurement

Selection of reported results

Overall risk of bias

Swedish et al. 2012 [25]a

+

–

++

++

–

++

++

–

Swedish and Goldstone 2014 [34]a

+

–

++

++

–

++

++

–

Kahn et al. [24]b

– –

–

–

++

–

++

++

– –

  1. ++ low risk of bias, + moderate risk of bias, − serious risk of bias, – –- critical risk of bias
  2. aUnclear selection into study; differences in follow-up time between groups; loss-to-follow up
  3. bOnly unadjusted data available; unclear selection into study; loss-to-follow up; possible misclassification of intervention