Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Participatory design of an improvement intervention for the primary care management of possible sepsis using the Functional Resonance Analysis Method

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
10 Jan 2018 Submitted Original manuscript
13 Mar 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Stephen Macdonald
16 Mar 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ignacio Martin-Loeches
29 May 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Chrysanthi Papoutsi
28 Jun 2018 Author responded Author comments - Duncan McNab
Resubmission - Version 2
28 Jun 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 2
17 Jul 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Chrysanthi Papoutsi
29 Jul 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Stephen Macdonald
12 Aug 2018 Author responded Author comments - Duncan McNab
Resubmission - Version 3
12 Aug 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 3
28 Aug 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Chrysanthi Papoutsi
2 Sep 2018 Author responded Author comments - Duncan McNab
Resubmission - Version 4
2 Sep 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
3 Sep 2018 Editorially accepted
11 Oct 2018 Article published 10.1186/s12916-018-1164-x

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement