Skip to main content

Table 1 Model inputs of the analysis. In the probabilistic sensitivity analysis, the parameter inputs were simultaneously varied within the lower and upper estimates according to the distribution shown. In the deterministic sensitivity analysis, the parameter inputs were varied one-by-one between lower and upper inputs, while the “scenario” column shows inputs based on other plausible assumptions or sources

From: Cost-effectiveness of vaccination of immunocompetent older adults against herpes zoster in the Netherlands: a comparison between the adjuvanted subunit and live-attenuated vaccines

Variable

Base case

Lower

Upper

Distribution

Scenario

Reference (base case/scenario)

Demography

 Cohort size

     

Statistics Netherlands [29]

  50 years

253,491

    

  60 years

222,845

    

  70 years

217,058

    

  80 years

93,547

    

 Background mortality

Age-specific

    

Statistics Netherlands [28]

HZ epidemiology

 HZ incidence per 100,000 person-years

     

NIVEL [30]/incidence adjusted for immunocompetent population using Schroder [4]

  50–59 years

591

575

607

Beta

461

  60–69 years

857

835

878

Beta

669

  70–79 years

1190

1157

1222

Beta

929

  ≥ 80 years

1481

1435

1527

Beta

1156

 False positive HZ diagnoses (%)

10.0

7.9

12.4

Beta

0

Van Hoek [31]/assuming no false positives

 HZ hospitalization incidence per 100,000 person-years

     

Dutch Hospital Data [32]/incidence adjusted for the immunocompetent population using Hobbelen [49]

  50–59 years

2.5

2.1

2.9

Beta

2.2

  60–69 years

4.9

4.3

5.5

Beta

4.3

  70–79 years

9.5

8.4

10.6

Beta

8.3

 ≥ 80 years

18.4

16.4

20.4

Beta

16.1

 HZ 1-day hospital admission incidence per 100,000 person-years

     

Dutch Hospital Data [32]/incidence adjusted for the immunocompetent population using Hobbelen [49]

  50–59 years

3.6

3.1

4.0

Beta

3.1

  60–69 years

9.6

8.8

10.5

Beta

8.4

  70–79 years

21.8

20.1

23.4

Beta

19.1

  ≥ 80 years

28.2

25.8

30.7

Beta

24.8

 HZ mortality incidence per million person-years

     

Statistics Netherlands [34]/incidence adjusted for the immunocompetent population using Hobbelen [49]

  50–59 years

0.1

0.3

Beta

0.1

  60–69 years

0.4

0.05

0.7

Beta

0.3

  70–79 years

1.8

0.9

2.8

Beta

1.6

  80–89 years

16.5

12.6

20.5

Beta

14.3

  ≥ 90 years

108.9

84.6

133.2

Beta

94.5

 Misclassification HZ as underlying cause of death (%)

47.5

32.0

63.0

Beta

0

Mahamud [35]/assuming no misclassification

QALY loss

 QALY loss per HZ episode

     

Van Wijck [6]/utilities Van Hoek/QALY loss per HZ episode Van Hoek [31]

  50–59 years

0.040

0.025

0.063

a

0.034/0.067

  ≥ 60 years

0.057

0.039

0.093

a

0.053/0.200

 QALY loss per HZ death

Age-specific

    

Statistics Netherlands [28], Szende [36]

 QALY loss grade 3 adverse event per dose

     

Excluded/QALY loss for grade 3 adverse events (see Additional file 1)

  HZ/su

0

   

0.000329

  ZVL

0

   

0.000022

Costs (€, 2017)

 Health care costs

  GP visit, medication, specialist visit

     

Based on multiple sources (see Additional file 1)

   50–59 years

158

130

186

a

 

   ≥ 60 years

198

163

233

a

 

  Hospital admission

      

   50–59 years

2856

2490

3222

a

 

   60–69 years

3632

3166

4097

a

 

   70–79 years

3671

3325

4016

a

 

   ≥ 80 years

4504

4093

4915

a

 

  One-day hospital admission

282

    

Hakkaart-van Roijen [38]

  Healthcare costs in gained life years per averted HZ death

Age-specific

   

0

Statistics Netherlands [28], Van Baal [40]/excluding costs in gained life years

  Vaccine administration

11.36

    

SNPG [41]

 Patient costs

      

  OTC medication per HZ episode

     

Based on multiple sources (see Additional file 1)

   50–59 years

10.42

8.85

12.00

a

 

   ≥ 60 years

12.65

10.75

14.56

a

 

  Travel costs GP visit, medication, specialist care per HZ episode

     

Based on multiple sources (see Additional file 1)

   50–59 years

3.33

2.61

4.06

a

 

   ≥ 60 years

4.07

3.19

4.95

a

 

  Travel costs hospital per HZ hospital visit/hospitalization

5.79

     

  Travel costs per vaccination

0.43

     

 Productivity losses

      

  HZ episode

     

Based on multiple sources (see Additional file 1)

   50–59 years

398

230

744

a

 

   60–69 years

136

78

262

a

 

   ≥ 70 years

0

    

  HZ death

     

Friction period of 84 working days [27]

   50–59 years

14,937

    

   60–69 years

5074

    

   ≥ 70 years

    

Vaccine characteristics

 Vaccine uptake (%)

50

    

Assumption based on Eilers [42]

 Adherence to the second dose of HZ/su (%)

100

   

90, 70, 50

Assumption

 Efficacy HZ/su over time (linear function)

     

Function fitted using data from Cunningham [20], Lal [19] and Curran [47]

  Intercept

     

   50–69 years

0.981

0.904

1.057c

Normal

 

   ≥ 70 years

0.992

0.956

1.028c

Normal

 

  Slopeb

− 0.041

0.018

0.065

Beta

 

 Efficacy ZVL over time (one-minus-exponential function)d

    

Additional efficacy against PHN /post-licensure effectiveness against HZ

Function fitted using data from Oxman [11], Schmader [46] and Morrison [12]/see Additional file 1

  Intercept

− 0.893

− 1.04

− 0.75

Normal

  Slope

0.0807

0.058

0.104

Beta

  Risk ratio of efficacy by age

    

Estimated using Rohan [45] and Schmader [44]/see Additional file 1

   50–59 years

1.282

   

   60–64 years

1.274

   

   65–69 years

1.219

   

   70–74 years

0.852

   

   75–79 years

0.711

   

   80–84 years

0.391

   

   ≥ 85 years

0.152

   
  1. HZ herpes zoster, HZ/su HZ subunit vaccine, PHN post-herpetic neuralgia, QALY quality-adjusted life year, SNPG Stichting Nationaal Programma Grieppreventie, ZVL zoster vaccine live
  2. aAggregated costs from multiple cost items which were varied individually in the probabilistic sensitivity analysis (see Additional file 1)
  3. bThe slope of 0.009 was only used for 50- to 69-year-olds over the first 4 years covered by the trial. After 4 years, the slope of ≥ 70-year-olds was used
  4. cThe efficacy was rounded to 1 during the period that the efficacy function was above 1
  5. dThe efficacy of ZVL over time (in years) was modelled using a one-minus-exponential function 1 − exp(β1 + β2 × years), in which β1 is the intercept and β2 the slope. Risk ratios by age were used to modify the intercept. For instance, the efficacy of 60–64 years at time point zero was 1 − exp(1.274 × − 0.893 + 0 × 0.0807) = 67.9%. In our model, we used the VE of the age group 60–64 for vaccination of 60-year-olds, 70–74 for 70-year-olds, 80–84 for 80-year-olds and ≥ 85 years for the booster for 90-year-olds