Fitness to practise sanctions in UK doctors are predicted by poor performance at MRCGP and MRCP(UK) assessments: data linkage study
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|18 Jun 2018||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|12 Jul 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sam Leinster|
|17 Jul 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Matt S. Homer|
|3 Aug 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Paul Tiffin|
|28 Sep 2018||Author responded||Author comments - Richard Wakeford|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|28 Sep 2018||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|12 Oct 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Paul Tiffin|
|18 Oct 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Matt S. Homer|
|30 Oct 2018||Author responded||Author comments - Richard Wakeford|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|30 Oct 2018||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|31 Oct 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Matt S. Homer|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|9 Nov 2018||Editorially accepted|
|7 Dec 2018||Article published||10.1186/s12916-018-1214-4|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.