Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Fitness to practise sanctions in UK doctors are predicted by poor performance at MRCGP and MRCP(UK) assessments: data linkage study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
18 Jun 2018 Submitted Original manuscript
12 Jul 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sam Leinster
17 Jul 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Matt S. Homer
3 Aug 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Paul Tiffin
28 Sep 2018 Author responded Author comments - Richard Wakeford
Resubmission - Version 2
28 Sep 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 2
12 Oct 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Paul Tiffin
18 Oct 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Matt S. Homer
30 Oct 2018 Author responded Author comments - Richard Wakeford
Resubmission - Version 3
30 Oct 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 3
31 Oct 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Matt S. Homer
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
9 Nov 2018 Editorially accepted
7 Dec 2018 Article published 10.1186/s12916-018-1214-4

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement