Skip to main content

Table 1 Descriptive statistics for examination performance of candidates with and without ESCUW; means and standard deviations, t test results and Cohen’s d for effect size. All differences are significant with p < 0.001

From: Fitness to practise sanctions in UK doctors are predicted by poor performance at MRCGP and MRCP(UK) assessments: data linkage study

Exam

No ESCUW

ESCUW

Sig

Cohen’s d

MRCGP: AKT

0.011 (0.993)

N = 27,138

− 0.720 (1.165)

n = 423

t(27,559) = 14.99

− 0.734

MRCGP: CSA

0.011 (0.995)

N = 17,127

− 0.790 (1.073)

N = 238

t(17,363) = 12.33

− 0.805

MRCP(UK): Part 1

0.007 (0.997)

N = 36,934

− 0.610 (1.051)

N = 424

t(37,356) = 12.64

− 0.617

MRCP(UK): Part 2

0.005 (0.999)

N = 28,011

− 0.528 (0.956)

N = 274

t(28,283) = 8.80

− 0.536

MRCP(UK): PACES

0.007 (0.996)

N = 26,751

− 0.686 (1.126)

N = 289

t(27,038) = 11.76

− 0.696