Skip to main content

Table 3 Bivariate meta-analyses of false positive and negative rates

From: High-throughput, non-invasive prenatal testing for fetal rhesus D status in RhD-negative women: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Analysis case

Number of studies

False negative rate (at risk of sensitisation)

False positive rate (unnecessary anti-D)

Estimate (%)

95% CI

Estimate (%)

95% CI

Inconclusive tests treated as test positive

8

0.34

0.15–0.76

3.86

2.54–5.82

Excluding all women with inconclusive test results

8

0.35

0.15–0.82

1.26

0.87–1.83

Studies conducted in Bristol only

3

0.21

0.09–0.48

5.73

4.58–7.16