Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Participatory praxis as an imperative for health-related stigma research

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
1 Jun 2018 Submitted Original manuscript
19 Jun 2018 Author responded Author comments - Laurel Sprague
Resubmission - Version 2
19 Jun 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 2
24 Jul 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jie Zhuang
12 Aug 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Laura Nyblade
30 Sep 2018 Author responded Author comments - Laurel Sprague
Resubmission - Version 3
30 Sep 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 3
24 Oct 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Laura Nyblade
2 Nov 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jie Zhuang
19 Nov 2018 Author responded Author comments - Laurel Sprague
Resubmission - Version 4
19 Nov 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 4
19 Dec 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jie Zhuang
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
17 Jan 2019 Editorially accepted
15 Feb 2019 Article published 10.1186/s12916-019-1263-3

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement