Microbiology Investigation Criteria for Reporting Objectively (MICRO): a framework for the reporting and interpretation of clinical microbiology data
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|25 Sep 2018||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|4 Nov 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Matthew Robinson|
|12 Nov 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Michihiko Goto|
|19 Nov 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Rajeshwari Nair|
|17 Dec 2018||Author responded||Author comments - Paul Turner|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|17 Dec 2018||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|9 Jan 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Michihiko Goto|
|21 Jan 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Rajeshwari Nair|
|4 Mar 2019||Author responded||Author comments - Paul Turner|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|4 Mar 2019||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|6 Mar 2019||Editorially accepted|
|29 Mar 2019||Article published||10.1186/s12916-019-1301-1|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.