From: Knowledge translation in health: how implementation science could contribute more
Issue | Current practice | Desired practice | Possible strategies |
---|---|---|---|
Fit between problems and approaches to address these | Approach depends on the professional background of the practitioner, researcher or advisor | Approach depends on what fits best with the problem in healthcare practice | Researchers and advisors are trained in a variety of scientific disciplines and work in multidisciplinary teams |
Concepts, frameworks and theories for implementation, transfer and improvement | Proliferation of proposals; many are descriptive lists of items; testing and validation strictly within paradigms | Emphasis on testing, integration and refinement of middle-range theories | Better recognition of published work; funding of comparison across paradigms |
Stakeholder involvement in design and conduct of programs | Considered to be the single most important determinant of successful implementation, but most methods are loosely defined | Integration of evidence and theory with of stakeholder involvement, using well-specified approaches | Validation of structured approaches for stakeholder involvement |
Evaluation of outcomes of implementation programs | Decreased interest in rigorous effect evaluations of implementation interventions, such as randomized trials | Rigorous outcomes evaluation remain part of broader research programs, which likely comprise a variety of study designs and methods | Nurture knowledge and appreciation of rigorous evaluation of practices among healthcare practitioners, managers and policy makers |
Measurement of outcomes of improvement, transfer, and implementation | Descriptive documentation of professional practice, provider perceptions, or health outcomes | Advanced measures of rapid uptake of valuable practices, and rapid reduction of non-valuable practices | Design and validation of a new generation of outcome measures |