A rapid research needs appraisal methodology to identify evidence gaps to inform clinical research priorities in response to outbreaks—results from the Lassa fever pilot
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|12 Dec 2018||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|4 Jan 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ernest Tambo|
|25 Jan 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Lawrence C Madoff|
|21 Feb 2019||Author responded||Author comments - Louise Sigfrid|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|21 Feb 2019||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|13 Mar 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ernest Tambo|
|1 Apr 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Lawrence C Madoff|
|16 Apr 2019||Author responded||Author comments - Louise Sigfrid|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|16 Apr 2019||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|1 May 2019||Editorially accepted|
|11 Jun 2019||Article published||10.1186/s12916-019-1338-1|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.