Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: A rapid research needs appraisal methodology to identify evidence gaps to inform clinical research priorities in response to outbreaks—results from the Lassa fever pilot

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
12 Dec 2018 Submitted Original manuscript
4 Jan 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ernest Tambo
25 Jan 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lawrence C Madoff
21 Feb 2019 Author responded Author comments - Louise Sigfrid
Resubmission - Version 2
21 Feb 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 2
13 Mar 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ernest Tambo
1 Apr 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lawrence C Madoff
16 Apr 2019 Author responded Author comments - Louise Sigfrid
Resubmission - Version 3
16 Apr 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
1 May 2019 Editorially accepted
11 Jun 2019 Article published 10.1186/s12916-019-1338-1

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement