Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: ‘Caveat emptor’: the cautionary tale of endocarditis and the potential pitfalls of clinical coding data—an electronic health records study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
17 Jan 2019 Submitted Original manuscript
7 Feb 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Martin Thornhill
11 Mar 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Joan Casey
28 Apr 2019 Author responded Author comments - Nicola Fawcett
Resubmission - Version 2
28 Apr 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 2
3 May 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Joan Casey
17 May 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Martin Thornhill
19 Jun 2019 Author responded Author comments - Nicola Fawcett
Resubmission - Version 3
19 Jun 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 3
24 Jun 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Martin Thornhill
9 Jul 2019 Author responded Author comments - Nicola Fawcett
Resubmission - Version 4
9 Jul 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
12 Jul 2019 Editorially accepted
4 Sep 2019 Article published 10.1186/s12916-019-1390-x

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement