Skip to main content

Table 3 RF and general distress comparisons: CA+ (n = 631) versus CA− (n = 499) groups

From: Unravelling the complex nature of resilience factors and their changes between early and later adolescence

 

Age

CA+

CA−

W/χ2(df)

95% CI*1

p*2

Friendship support (high)

14

0.09

0.23

173,600

.04 to .22

< .01

17

0.07

0.30

180,700

.12 to .33

< .001

Family support (high)

14

− 0.02

0.17

178,690

.09 to .29

< .001

17

− 0.07

0.14

180,780

.12 to .33

< .001

Family cohesion (high)

14

− 0.10

0.29

198,690

.30 to .51

< .001

17

− 0.18

0.29

198,080

.37 to .63

< .001

Negative self-esteem (low)

14

0.06

0.29

182,270

.11 to .31

< .001

17

0.10

0.55

187,900

.25 to .58

< .001

Positive self-esteem (high)

14

− 0.08

0.21

188,440

.20 to .41

< .001

17

− 0.14

0.22

192,880

.26 to .50

< .001

Ruminative brooding (low)

14

0.03

0.19

175,000

.07 to .28

< .01

17

− 0.07

0.12

182,540

.11 to .28

< .001

Reflective rumination (low)

14

0.10

0.20

167,440

− .00 to .19

.066

17

− 0.08

0.00

170,430

.01 to .15

< .05

Distress tolerance (high)

14

− 0.06

0.25

188,300

.21 to .43

< .001

17

0.02

0.42

195,600

.30 to .53

< .001

Aggression (low)

14

Low: 498 (s = 1)

Low: 440 (s = 1)

16.27 (1)

 

< .001

High: 133 (s = 0)

High: 59 (s = 0)

17

Low: 491 (s = 1)

Low: 425 (s = 1)

09.35 (1)

 

< .01

High: 140 (s = 0)

High: 74 (s = 0)

Expressive suppression (low)

14

Low: 418 (s = 1)

Low: 371 (s = 1)

08.31 (1)

 

< .01

High: 213 (s = 0)

High: 128 (s = 0)

17

Low: 396 (s = 1)

Low: 355 (s = 1)

08.42 (1)

 

< .01

High: 235 (s = 0)

High: 144 (s = 0)

General distress

14

− 0.09

− 0.40

130,950

− .43 to − .18

< .001

17

− 0.09

− 0.68

125,400

− .75 to − .38

< .001

  1. Note. CA childhood adversity. All RFs are scored in such a way that high values are protective (e.g. high levels of high friendship support or high levels of low negative self-esteem) and low values are harmful (e.g. low levels of high friendship support or low levels of low negative self-esteem). The continuous general distress variable is scored in such a way that the higher the value the higher the level of general distress. *1The confidence interval (CI) for the difference in location estimates, corresponding to the alternative hypothesis. *2Please note the p values are corrected for the false discovery rate, which is why the CIs do not have to contain 0 for the p value to be nonsignificant
Back to article page

BMC Medicine

ISSN: 1741-7015

Contact us