Fig. 3From: Accuracy in detecting inadequate research reporting by early career peer reviewers using an online CONSORT-based peer-review tool (COBPeer) versus the usual peer-review process: a cross-sectional diagnostic studyProportions of items evaluated by early career reviewers and usual peer review classified as true positive (TP), false negative (FN), true negative (TN), and false positive (FP)Back to article page